<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dealing With Adwords Quality Score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, it's Supreme.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:55:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Powerful Posts - May 10th, 2007 &#124; Nate Whitehill dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Powerful Posts - May 10th, 2007 &#124; Nate Whitehill dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 03:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>[...] Coopreme - Dealing With Adwords Quality Score [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coopreme &#8211; Dealing With Adwords Quality Score [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog</title>
		<link>http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;hi...&lt;/strong&gt;

i agree...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>hi&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>i agree&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msdanielle</title>
		<link>http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>msdanielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 04:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>i just wrote an article on this last week too. i don&#039;t think they would penalize you for having words like &quot;sign up&quot; or &quot;buy&quot; since i had a sign up form on my site and not a huge amount of content, but i was still able to get a &quot;great&quot; score and min cpc bids from $.02 - $.05.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just wrote an article on this last week too. i don&#8217;t think they would penalize you for having words like &#8220;sign up&#8221; or &#8220;buy&#8221; since i had a sign up form on my site and not a huge amount of content, but i was still able to get a &#8220;great&#8221; score and min cpc bids from $.02 &#8211; $.05.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CustardMite</title>
		<link>http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>CustardMite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Apologies - misread the original post.

Not sure how Google can identify whether a site is information only, fishing for subscriptions or is selling something - a lot of the commercial campaigns that I work with use an external site for processing orders.

It&#039;d be a bit harsh if a site was penalised for words like &quot;Buy&quot; on the landing page, when these are the same keywords that generate the most traffic in the first place (and clickthrough rate is a key driver in the Quality Score).

I&#039;d be interested in your results; any insights into what Google&#039;s looking for on a landing page are always valuable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies &#8211; misread the original post.</p>
<p>Not sure how Google can identify whether a site is information only, fishing for subscriptions or is selling something &#8211; a lot of the commercial campaigns that I work with use an external site for processing orders.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be a bit harsh if a site was penalised for words like &#8220;Buy&#8221; on the landing page, when these are the same keywords that generate the most traffic in the first place (and clickthrough rate is a key driver in the Quality Score).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in your results; any insights into what Google&#8217;s looking for on a landing page are always valuable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coop</title>
		<link>http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Coop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 16:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hey Custard,

If you look at my post you&#039;ll see that I don&#039;t say anything about Google penalizing Non-Commercial site. I actually said that it is possible that they give a lower minimum bid to site that is focused more on the information side. Although this may not be true, gonna do some testing to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Custard,</p>
<p>If you look at my post you&#8217;ll see that I don&#8217;t say anything about Google penalizing Non-Commercial site. I actually said that it is possible that they give a lower minimum bid to site that is focused more on the information side. Although this may not be true, gonna do some testing to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CustardMite</title>
		<link>http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>CustardMite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 08:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coopreme.com/archives/dealing-with-adwords-quality-score/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve managed many non-commercial campaigns, and have never seen any evidence that Google&#039;s penalised them in any way.

It wouldn&#039;t really make sense for Google to do this, since often the user is looking for information, not something to buy. Google doesn&#039;t gain a percentage of the sales, and it makes no difference to Google which site appears at the top of the search results, they just want to make the results relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve managed many non-commercial campaigns, and have never seen any evidence that Google&#8217;s penalised them in any way.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t really make sense for Google to do this, since often the user is looking for information, not something to buy. Google doesn&#8217;t gain a percentage of the sales, and it makes no difference to Google which site appears at the top of the search results, they just want to make the results relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
